On Dec 3, 2009, at 1:32 PM, mpekor@optonline. net wrote:
I don't see the point in working on that particular skill (fajin) since there are simpler ways to develope striking power.
Michael Phillips responds:
It's probably just a question of experience then, Mike; speaking for myself, I had practiced northern shaolin for 4 1/2 years and risen to the rank of assistant Instructor, so it would be fair to assume that I knew how to throw a punch or a kick with 'normal' martial power - but as soon as I experienced being hit with 'internal' power, my only reaction after hitting the floor was, "Damn! I wanna get me some of that stuff!" It took only a matter of seconds for me to "see the point"...... And more relevantly, back in the old days before guns, Internal power was definitely a technical advantage on the battlefield, since the power that an internal master could put into a strike with something like a kwandao was 2-3 times more than what you could get with 'external' power...... You are absolutely right in saying that it's not 'simple' to develop that kind of power, though. On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:46 PM, mpekor@optonline. net wrote:
If you met a great boxer who could hit you at will with awesome controlled power... and you couldn't get near him, would that also give you that "I gotta get some more of that" reaction?
MP: I started as a boxer, Mike - when I was a teenager, I trained at the west side CYO, where Gil Clancy was training Emile Griffith, and when he had a free moment, he'd sometimes coach us kids. Emile himself taught me how to fight my way out of the ring 'corner' - he had a special way of doing it, he held his arms parallel to the floor rather than perpendicular, so he could block both hooks AND uppercuts with relative ease......
I won four out of my five fights in the youth league, due to such excellent coaching, and in the process, I rescued myself from becoming an irredeemable 'nerd' - I was one of those 'brainiac' kids with glasses who read books all the time, but boxing transformed me from just being a nerd into a nerd who could kick your ass if you pissed him off....... I tell you all this just so you can know that I'm very, very, fond of boxing - I owe a great debt to my boxing training, since it literally changed my life. The Internal is better. Especially for "the long haul".
On Jan 30, 2010, at 9:28 AM, fbernall wrote:
I think this whole idea of "switching" from internal to external is an illusion... When the time to fight comes, you just fight...
Just to clarify, I meant that the idea "switching" from the Internal to the External on the "spur of the moment" or at the actual point of fighting is an illusion - if the Internal methods haven't become your "go-to" choice to deal with physical force, then you haven't yet trained sufficiently in the Internal method. A lot of people think that TCC is just "tricky business" - the archetype being some old chinese wizard that you just can't seem to "land" on, and who seems to be able to rob you of your balance and power-base at will..... The "illusion" is that they need only use the legendary "four ounces" to throw you out, and this is frequently true - but that's not nearly "all they've got".....
Any real Internal master can reach out and touch you with such power that your biological mechanism will react with real and genuine fear of it's own life - I emphasize that this is not your "personality" reacting, it is on the level of basic biology. They can do this despite the admonition not to use "force against force" because of something they never tell you about the "flip-side" of that saying - that you can use Internal "energy" directly against force, and and that Energy will cut through your opponent's force like a hot knife through butter.
As Yang Cheng-fu said: "First you do what you must, then you can do what you will".